Correcting the details.
Description - A small little functionality which allows us to send thank you email to authenticated or anonymous user when they comment on a node. For anonymous, mail will be send only when email is being provided by the visitor.
Link - http://drupal.org/sandbox/vaibhavjain/1422572
GIT - git clone --branch 6.x-1.x http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/vaibhavjain/1422572.git thank_you_commenter
Drupal Version - currently only for 6.x
Reviewed the modules
http://drupal.org/node/1425392
http://drupal.org/node/1425624
http://drupal.org/node/1425720
http://drupal.org/node/1426894
http://drupal.org/node/1426952
http://drupal.org/node/1427016
http://drupal.org/node/1439308
http://drupal.org/node/1438600
http://drupal.org/node/1437126
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #19 | thank-you-commenter-1.JPG | 23.55 KB | atul.bhosale |
| #19 | thank-you-commenter-2.JPG | 22.81 KB | atul.bhosale |
| #10 | drupalcs-result.txt | 1.36 KB | klausi |
Comments
Comment #1
vaibhavjainPlease check for 6x branch, master does not contain any module file, just an info and readme file.
Comment #2
drupaledmonk commentedPlease follow the guidelines to apply for full project access. http://drupal.org/node/1011698
Comment #3
vaibhavjainI checked on the link, and i found that description was one thing I was missing on.
Here the correct details.
Description - A small little functionality which allows us to send thank you email to authenticated or anonymous user when they comment on a node. For anonymous, mail will be send only when email is being provided by the visitor.
Link - http://drupal.org/sandbox/vaibhavjain/1422572
GIT - git clone --branch 6.x-1.x http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/vaibhavjain/1422572.git thank_you_commenter
Drupal Version - currently only for 6.
Hope i am correct this time.
Comment #4
drupaledmonk commentedPlease update the first post and change the issue status to needs review.
Comment #5
vaibhavjainComment #5.0
vaibhavjainCorrecting details
Comment #5.1
vaibhavjainadding reviewed modules links
Comment #5.2
vaibhavjainadded another module link reviewed.
Comment #6
vaibhavjainApplying for PAReview: review bonus
Comment #7
patrickd commentedSorry but
See #1410826: [META] Review bonus
you only did a little manual review at one issue
Comment #8
vaibhavjain@patrickd - Thanks patrick, will take care of that.
Comment #8.0
vaibhavjainAdded another project link
Comment #8.1
vaibhavjainadding reviewed module links
Comment #8.2
vaibhavjainAnother module review link added.
Comment #9
vaibhavjainApplying for PAReview bonus
Comment #10
klausiThere are still files other than README.txt in the master branch, make sure to remove them. See also step 5 in http://drupal.org/node/1127732
Review of the 6.x-1.x branch:
This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. Get a review bonus and we will come back to your application sooner.
manual review:
http://drupal.org/project/rules
http://drupal.org/project/token
Removing the review bonus tag, you can do another 3 reviews and add it again.
Comment #12
vaibhavjainSorry for the late reply, was completely lost in the project.
The master branch is now clear, updated the branch according to the link.
Function names updated, but for the line endings, they are still an issue with us.
For the functionality, Yes it can be achieved by rules and tokens, but for every content type and we will have to define another set of rules to do the same task. if this is same, yes it can be achieved via single rule set.
Also, when it comes to interface, it is definitely not so user friendly for a non-developer to handle this. We are providing a much simpler and easy to use interface for the same.
Even if we give permissions, it will expose all rules rather than few specific ones, which we might not want to do, which is not the case with this code.
We are providing this interface to our client, and thus build the same.
Also, we are pretty sure that we will be expanding this for per role, and per content type too.
Infact, we might go for a different mail for every content type too.
Right now, it is restricted only to anonymous and authenticated users only for all content type.
Once we are through with this process we will go ahead and work for another release, and for Drupal 7 too.
Comment #12.0
vaibhavjainAdded link to module reviewed
Comment #13
vaibhavjainApplying for PAReview: review bonus
Comment #14
klausiReview of the 6.x-1.x branch:
This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. Get a review bonus and we will come back to your application sooner.
manual review:
Otherwise this looks nearly ready to me. I'm removing the review bonus tag as your reviews were quite short, you can add it again if you have done another 3 reviews of other projects. Thanks!
Comment #15
vaibhavjainfinally removed bad line endings :)
also, access arguments updated, implemented hook_perm
#options updated to another function running check_plain
Also made use of "tyc_content_types"
everything runs good for me, just waiting for review.
Comment #16
klausiPlease don't remove the security tag, we keep that for statistics and to show examples of security issues.
Comment #17
vaibhavjainOopsie... sorry, I wasn't aware of this at all :)
Comment #18
vaibhavjainComment #19
atul.bhosale commentedManual review
(Just install module and do not change any thing in mail format and add a comment as Anonymous user module send an email but in email it shows:
Hi !name,
Thank you for commenting on: .....
Works perfectly with !username
Other suggestion
Comment #20
vaibhavjainThe above two issues have been rectified.
Comment #21
klausiSorry for the delay. Make sure to review more project applications and get a new review bonus to get this finished faster.
manual review:
Although you should definitively fix those issues they are no hard blockers for me, so I would say RTBC.
Comment #22
vaibhavjainThanks Klausi,
I have made the changes specified.
Comment #23
misc commentedThanks for your contribution, vaibhavjain! Welcome to the community of project contributors on drupal.org.
I've granted you the git vetted user role which will let you promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either sandbox or "full" projects depending on which you feel is best.
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
As you continue to work on your module, keep in mind: Commit messages - providing history and credit and Release naming conventions.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.
Comment #24
vaibhavjainThanks MiSc for all your efforts.
Thanks everyone who reviewed my module. :)
Comment #25.0
(not verified) commentedAdding reviewed modules links